Juicer.io Pricing in 2026: Every Plan Explained (and Where the Gaps Are)

Juicer.io has been in the social media aggregation market for over a decade. It has a five-star rated WordPress plugin, integrates with 15-plus social platforms, and has built a loyal user base of small businesses, nonprofits, educators, and agencies. Before you sign up — or before you upgrade from the free plan — it is worth understanding exactly what each tier costs, what you are actually getting, and where the pricing structure creates friction that you will not discover until you are already committed.

Most Juicer pricing articles online either quote outdated plan names (the old Small/Medium/Large structure was replaced), skip the Enterprise billing model entirely, or miss the platform restrictions that apply to lower tiers. This guide covers all of it.

Juicer.io Plans and Pricing at a Glance (2026)

Juicer currently offers four main plan tiers plus two specialised options for events and white-label agency use. Here is the complete breakdown:

Note: LinkedIn and X/Twitter sources are only available during the 7-day trial on Lite, Starter, and Pro plans. Ongoing LinkedIn and X/Twitter access requires an Enterprise subscription.

Annual billing reduces prices by approximately 10 percent on eligible plans.

The Free Plan: What You Actually Get

Juicer's free plan gives you two social media sources and a single embeddable feed that updates once every 24 hours. Your feed displays Juicer's branding — a logo shown above the feed and occasionally on individual posts.

The two-source limit means you can connect two accounts: for example, your Instagram and your Facebook page. Any third account — YouTube, TikTok, a hashtag feed — requires a paid upgrade. The single-feed limit means everything goes into one embed, so if you want to show different social content on different pages of your website, the free plan cannot do it.

The 24-hour refresh rate is the most meaningful limitation for businesses. If you post to Instagram on Monday morning, that post may not appear in your website feed until Tuesday. For a live business where social activity is part of your customer experience, this delay erodes the value of having a social feed at all.

Who the free plan actually works for: Personal blogs, test environments, and developers evaluating the embed mechanics before committing. For any business-facing website, the restrictions make it too limited to serve as a genuine product.

The Lite Plan (~$15/mo): The "Remove Branding" Tier

The Lite plan adds one meaningful thing over the free tier: it removes Juicer's branding from your feed. It also adds a third source slot. The refresh rate stays at 24 hours.

If your primary issue with the free plan is the Juicer logo appearing in your feed, the Lite plan solves that. If your issue is anything else — refresh speed, number of sources, multiple embeds — it does not.

At roughly $5 per source per month, the Lite plan is not a terrible value for what it delivers. But 24-hour refresh on a paid plan in 2026 is a genuine limitation. Most competitors remove their branding and offer hourly or faster refresh at comparable or lower price points.

Who the Lite plan works for: Small businesses that want a clean, branding-free social feed showing two or three accounts, and where daily content updates are sufficient. A restaurant showing its Instagram and Facebook page, both of which post a few times per week, would be a practical fit.

The Starter Plan (~$25/mo): The Real Entry Point for Most Businesses

This is where most SMBs and growing businesses will land when they first upgrade from free. The Starter plan gives you five sources, one embeddable feed, and an hourly refresh rate. Juicer's branding is removed. You get basic custom CSS access and the ability to add call-to-action buttons to posts.

Five sources covers the typical brand social footprint: Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and one hashtag feed. That is a reasonable set for most small businesses.

The hourly refresh rate is functional for brands that post a few times per week. It will not feel real-time during an active campaign, but for evergreen social content displayed on a homepage, one hour is workable.

The critical limitation here that almost no review mentions: LinkedIn and X/Twitter are only available during Juicer's initial 7-day trial on the Starter plan. After the trial ends, those two platforms are restricted to Enterprise subscribers only. If you are a B2B company whose primary social channels are LinkedIn and X/Twitter, the Starter plan effectively does not support your use case at all after the first week.

This is not buried in fine print — Juicer does disclose it on the pricing page — but it is consistently overlooked in third-party reviews. Discovering this after you have published a social feed to your website and then watching it stop updating because your LinkedIn token expired is a frustrating experience.

One feed is a structural constraint. The Starter plan's single feed means every source you connect feeds into the same widget. If you want your homepage to show Instagram posts and your about page to show testimonials from Twitter, you are stuck — you cannot create a second, differently configured embed. Different layouts, different page placements, different curation rules all require the same single embed.

Who the Starter plan works for: Small businesses whose primary social channels are Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok; who need a single well-designed feed embedded on one section of their website; and who do not rely heavily on LinkedIn or X/Twitter for brand presence.

The Pro Plan ($99/mo): The Multi-Source Option With a Hidden Ceiling

The Pro plan is a significant jump from Starter in both capability and price. You get 30 sources spread across three embeddable feeds, a 10-minute refresh rate, analytics, and full custom CSS. The 10-minute refresh is a meaningful upgrade for businesses with active social accounts or running live campaigns.

The jump from $25 to $99 per month is steep — nearly a 4x increase. And there is nothing in between. If you need 8 sources instead of 5, you still pay $99. If you need 12 sources, you still pay $99. The jump from Starter to Pro is binary, and for businesses that fall in the 6-to-15 source range, the pricing gap feels disproportionate to the added value.

The feed-cap problem. 30 sources across only 3 feeds means each feed averages 10 sources. This is a constraint that many users do not anticipate. If you want to embed your Instagram feed on the homepage (Feed 1), your YouTube content on a resources page (Feed 2), and a combined multi-platform feed in your blog sidebar (Feed 3), you have used all three available feeds. Any additional embed placement requires a fourth feed — which requires Enterprise.

For businesses managing multiple sub-brands, landing pages, or campaign microsites, three feeds fills up quickly. The Pro plan markets itself as the option for businesses and e-commerce sites, but the three-feed ceiling is a real operational constraint for anything beyond a basic single-site deployment.

Analytics are included but remain basic. Pro plan analytics give you post-level metrics — impressions, clicks, engagement — but do not include conversion attribution, UTM tracking, or audience cohort analysis. For a $99/month tool, this feels like a gap that more modern competitors have started to close.

Who the Pro plan works for: Businesses managing multiple social platforms with high posting frequency where the 10-minute refresh rate matters — product launches, live events, always-on social marketing. Also appropriate for agencies managing a single client with a complex multi-platform presence. It is not well-suited for agencies managing multiple clients (the three-feed cap becomes restrictive fast) or for any brand that depends on LinkedIn or X/Twitter (still excluded from this plan).

The Enterprise Plan ($199/mo minimum): The Only Option for LinkedIn, X/Twitter, and Multi-Client Agencies

The Enterprise plan is Juicer's most powerful tier, and it is the only one that includes LinkedIn and X/Twitter as permanent sources rather than trial-only features. It also includes API access, white-label branding, team management with user roles, unlimited feeds, and unlimited sources.

The billing model is unusual and worth understanding before you sign up.Enterprise is not a flat monthly fee. It uses a usage-based pricing model with a $199 minimum monthly charge. Here is how it actually works:

At the start of each billing period, you are charged $199 upfront. Throughout the month, Juicer records your usage — calculated based on the number of feeds, sources, and the refresh frequency you have configured. At the end of the month, if your actual usage exceeded $199, the difference is charged on the following month's invoice alongside the next period's base fee.

In practice: if you use $250 worth of feed activity in January, you pay $199 in January and then $250 in February ($199 base for February plus the $51 difference from January). If your usage stays below $199, you simply pay $199 every month with no overage.

This model is designed fairly — you are never charged more than your actual usage in any given month — but it creates a delayed billing pattern that can catch users off guard. More importantly, it means the "starting at $199" framing obscures the fact that your actual bill may be higher depending on how many feeds you run, how many sources you connect, and how frequently those feeds refresh.

The faster the refresh rate on each feed, the more expensive that feed becomes on the Enterprise plan. A feed running at 1-minute updates costs significantly more than the same feed at hourly updates. If you increase refresh frequency during a live event and forget to reduce it afterward, your next invoice will reflect that.

White-label and API access make Enterprise the only viable choice for agencies.The white-label feature lets you replace all Juicer branding with your own, including a custom subdomain for the client-facing login area. API access enables programmatic feed creation and management, which is essential for agencies building integrations or managing high feed volumes. For this specific use case — agencies reselling social aggregation as part of a broader service package — Enterprise's unlimited feeds and white-label capabilities justify the price.

Who Enterprise works for: Agencies managing multiple clients' social feeds under their own brand, businesses whose primary social channels are LinkedIn or X/Twitter, and organizations with high-volume or event-driven needs where refresh speed and feed count matter. Enterprise is not a good fit for small businesses or solo operators who will inevitably pay the $199 minimum every month regardless of usage.

The Two Niche Options: Events and Pages

Event/Campaign Plan: Juicer offers a separate event-specific plan for one-time social wall deployments. Rather than a monthly subscription, you pay a flat fee for a set duration — ideal for conferences, trade shows, or product launches where you need a live social wall for a weekend and do not want to pay for an ongoing monthly subscription. Pricing is quoted on request via juicer.io/events-contact.

Pages Product: Juicer's newer Pages feature lets you create standalone landing pages powered by a social feed — useful for link-in-bio pages, campaign microsites, or simple web presences that do not require a full website. This is included in regular Juicer plans and does not require a separate subscription.

The Platform Restriction Nobody Talks About

To restate this clearly because it is the single most impactful pricing detail that almost every Juicer review online misses:

LinkedIn and X/Twitter are available as sources on all Juicer plans for the first 7 days only. After the trial period, ongoing access to these two platforms requires an Enterprise subscription at $199/month minimum.

This means:

• A B2B brand on the Starter plan ($25/mo) that wants to show its LinkedIn company feed on its website cannot do that after the first week without paying $199/month.
• A media company that wants to aggregate X/Twitter mentions alongside Instagram posts on the Pro plan ($99/mo) cannot maintain that integration after the trial expires.
• If you set up a social feed during the trial that includes LinkedIn, that feed will stop updating for those sources once the 7 days are up.

This is not a hidden policy — Juicer notes it in the pricing page footnotes. But given how central LinkedIn is to B2B marketing and how many businesses consider X/Twitter a core social channel, the fact that these platforms are effectively paywalled behind Enterprise pricing is a meaningful limitation that should inform your plan selection before you sign up.

Juicer Pricing vs. Competitors: The Direct Comparison

The most striking comparison is the LinkedIn/X restriction. Curator.io, Taggbox, CollectSocials (on roadmap), and most other competitors include these platforms on standard paid plans. Juicer's decision to gate them behind Enterprise creates a meaningful gap for B2B-focused brands.

Is Juicer.io Worth It? An Honest Verdict by User Type

For personal bloggers and creators: The free plan is genuinely usable if you only need one or two social accounts and can tolerate daily refresh rates and Juicer's branding. The Lite plan at ~$15/month makes sense if removing the branding is important and daily updates are sufficient. For this audience, Juicer is a reasonable choice.

For small businesses (Instagram, Facebook, YouTube-focused): The Starter plan at ~$25/month works if your active channels are among the non-restricted platforms and you only need a single feed placement. The one-feed limitation is a real constraint if you have a multi-page website. CollectSocials' Pro plan at $19/month delivers the same source count with unlimited feed placements at a lower price — worth evaluating before committing to Juicer.

For B2B businesses or brands heavily using LinkedIn/X: The Starter and Pro plans are not viable for your use case beyond the 7-day trial. You are looking at Enterprise at $199/month minimum, which is a steep entry point for LinkedIn access alone. Competitors like Curator.io and Taggbox include these platforms on standard plans at $25-$39/month.

For growing businesses that need 6-15 sources: There is no plan for you at Juicer. You jump directly from 5 sources at $25/month to 30 sources at $99/month. If you need 8 sources, you are paying $99/month whether you use the other 22 or not. This gap in the plan structure is one of the most common complaints from mid-market Juicer users. Competitors with more granular source tiers — or unlimited-feed models that let you do more with fewer sources — serve this segment more efficiently.

For agencies managing multiple clients: Enterprise at $199/month is the only option that includes white-label and API access. The usage-based billing model is fair but requires careful management of refresh rates to avoid unexpected overages. If you are billing clients at a markup and managing 10-plus separate social feeds, the Enterprise economics can work. For smaller agencies managing fewer clients, the $199 minimum may not be justified — and white-label alternatives at lower price points are worth evaluating.

For event organizers: The one-time event plan is the right choice over a monthly subscription. Juicer has a proven track record with event social walls, and paying a flat rate for a specific date range is a sensible model for occasional use.

The Bottom Line

Juicer.io is a mature, reliable social media aggregator with a decade of development behind it. The product works, the WordPress plugin is genuinely excellent, and the customer support — while email-only — is responsive.

The pricing structure, however, has some structural gaps that matter depending on your situation. The jump from $25 to $99 with nothing in between leaves mid-market users either overpaying or underserved. The LinkedIn and X/Twitter restriction behind Enterprise pricing is a genuine blocker for B2B brands. The feed cap on the Pro plan limits flexibility for multi-page sites and agencies. And the Enterprise billing model, while fair, requires understanding before you sign up.

If your needs fit squarely within what Juicer's Lite or Starter plans deliver — a clean feed from two to five non-restricted platforms, one embed location, hourly or daily refresh — it is a functional choice at a fair price. If you have needs that push you toward the gaps described above, it is worth exploring what the alternatives offer before committing.

For a detailed comparison of how Juicer stacks up against seven alternatives on design, pricing, and features, see the full Juicer.io alternatives guide.