Your supporters are already posting. Put it on your site: a live Instagram and Facebook feed for charities, community groups, faith groups and NGOs, with a separate feed for every programme or branch and recorded consent that supporters can withdraw whenever they want.
No card, no charity application to fill in, and no proof of status to send. The free plan is simply free.
7 layouts, all 16 themes and the theme builder, unlimited feeds and unlimited people on the account. Small organisations run on it permanently rather than growing out of it in a fortnight.
Send a rights request from the post itself. The supporter approves or declines on a plain page, and the same link still carries a Withdraw button months later.
Every programme, branch or local group runs its own feed with its own coordinator, and they combine on your main appeal page. Feeds and team members are unlimited on every plan.
Anything a public tag brings in waits for a person. Keyword rules run on every plan, and your donate page shows what somebody released rather than whatever the internet attached to your hashtag.
Publishing a photograph of the people you work with is not the same as reposting a product shot, and the usual answer, a comment saying yes under a post somewhere, is not something you can find again eighteen months later. So the request, the terms they agreed to and the date all get recorded, and the link they answered on keeps working so they can change their mind.
The labels under each card are the real stored states a rights request moves through, not illustrative names.
This records consent and lets people withdraw it. It is a product behaviour, not a certification: nothing here makes you compliant with any regulation, and none of it is legal advice. Whether a particular photograph should be published is a decision for your own safeguarding and data policies.
Consent tracking is on every plan, including the free one. The free and Pro plans carry five rights requests a month and Business upwards is uncapped, but a consent you have already recorded is never taken away by a plan change, and a supporter can withdraw at any time on any plan.
Charity, nonprofit, not-for-profit, NGO, foundation, trust, community group, association, faith group. The label matters less than how you are organised, because that is what decides whether you want one feed or fifteen and whether the review queue is on from day one.
Give every branch its own feed and its own coordinator, then combine them on the national appeal page. Because feeds and team members are unlimited on every plan, twelve branches costs the same as one, and a branch can start before head office has decided anything.
Congregation photos are the sensitive part, so the useful default is a feed of your own accounts with the review queue on, plus rights requests for anything a member posted. The same feed runs on the hall screen for notices before a service.
Start on the free plan and do not talk to anyone. Connect the accounts you already post from, pick a layout, paste one line into your site. If your site is WordPress or Squarespace the snippet differs, and the embed picker gives you the right one.
Each country office keeps its own feed in its own language and its own approvers, so a restricted-fund report page can show only the programme that funder paid for. Nothing forces every office through one shared account.
The feed you want is usually other people’s: the organisations you fund, posting about the work. Rights requests are the mechanism for that, because publishing a grantee’s photograph on your site is exactly the case where asking first matters.
Conservation posts about the river, the arts programme posts about the workshop, the fundraising team posts about the gala, and a branch three counties away posts about all of it. Pour that into one feed and a funder cannot find the work they paid for. So each keeps its own, and the appeal page shows the combination.
One combined feed where a first-time visitor lands, showing the work happening this week rather than the campaign photography you commissioned two years ago.
Every programme feed also stands alone, so a branch page or a restricted-fund report shows only that work and a funder sees the thing they paid for.
A diagram of the structure, not a screenshot of the dashboard. Thornmere Trust is invented for these mockups and is not a real charity.
The moment a hashtag works, it attracts people who are not your supporters. Everything a public tag brings in waits in a queue for somebody to release, keyword rules run on every plan, and pulling something already published takes it down without anyone editing the site.
Two streams, guarded differently. Posts from your own connected accounts go through the filters: keyword rules on every plan, and image scoring that reads the picture rather than the caption on Business and above. Those filters do not run on what a stranger sends from a phone at an event. That stream is held for a person instead, which is why review first is the default.
Most charity websites show commissioned photography from a campaign that ended two years ago, because refreshing it is somebody's job that never reaches the top of the list. A live feed is the work that happened this week, combining 10 platforms, and it updates whether or not anyone remembers to update it.
Supporter photography arrives in every shape there is, and a grid of fixed squares crops the best of it. Masonry is also in the free layout set, so this is the one you can run without paying.
A campaign has a shape, and a restoration or a build or an appeal reads better in sequence than shuffled. A timeline keeps the order the work actually happened in, which is what a funder is reading for.
What a volunteer writes about a morning they spent with you persuades better than the same fact in your own voice. A quote wall puts the words first and the photo second, which is the right order for testimony.
Appeal films, site visits and volunteer takeovers are video first. A gallery treats them as video rather than as thumbnails that happen to move, and pulls YouTube, TikTok and Vimeo into one wall.
Booked the sunrise trip on the strength of the photos and it was better than the pictures. The guides knew exactly where to be and when.
YouTubeThree days on the ridge trail, start to finish
TikTokThe swings go right out over the water
Sunrise crew made the ridge before the storm broke. Whole set is up on the site now.
Lagoon day. Six boats out, nobody tipped in, and the water stayed that colour the whole afternoon.
Second trip with them this year. Everything ran on time and the small group size is the whole point.
InstagramFound the yellow wall. Obviously we danced at it.
InstagramMade the crest just before the sun did.
InstagramUp before the balloons were.
End of the festival, and they let the whole lot go at once. Nobody said a word for about ten seconds.
A demo feed for an invented brand, showing 6 of the 10 live sources in one wall. The posts, reviewers and engagement numbers are illustrative, not product metrics. Every field on these cards is one the widget really renders, but the wall itself is drawn for this page rather than served by the widget.
Before you print a campaign tag on anything, it is worth reading how to run a hashtag campaign. For the consent side in depth, including what happens when somebody withdraws, our UGC rights and deletion test is the long version of the section above. And for a gala or a sponsored run, the social wall for events covers screens and supporter posting.
A discounted charity plan usually means a form, a registration number and an annual re-check. The free plan skips all of that by being free for everyone.
Free feeds carry a visible link back to us, which is how the free plan pays for itself. Paid plans can turn it off. If you grow past the free allowance, Pro at $29 a month lifts the view limit and the source count, and Business at $59 makes page views unmetered and opens live event walls for your gala or sponsored run. Full pricing breakdown.
The free plan is free for everybody, so there is no charity application to fill in and no proof of status to send. It carries 7 of the 40 layouts, all 16 themes, the theme builder, custom colours and fonts, unlimited feeds and unlimited people on the account, with 1 connected source (3 through your 7-day trial) and a small monthly view allowance. Free feeds carry a visible link back to us, which is the trade. Plenty of small organisations never need to leave it.
Send a rights request from the post itself. The person gets a link to a plain page showing the exact post and the exact terms, with Approve and Decline, and no account or app at any point. Approved content is what publishes. What matters more for a charity is the fourth state: the same link keeps working, so somebody who agreed in March can withdraw in November without emailing anyone or finding the right person to ask.
It gives you the mechanism, and the judgement stays yours. What the product does is concrete: it records who agreed, to which post, under which version of the terms, and when; it holds anything from a public tag for a person to review before publication; and it lets somebody take their consent back afterwards, which is the part most tools have no answer for. What it does not do is tell you whether a particular photograph should be published, or certify you against any standard or regulation. If you work with people who cannot freely consent, that decision belongs with your safeguarding policy and not with a widget.
Yes, and it costs nothing extra. Feeds are unlimited on every plan including the free one, and so are team members, so each branch can keep its own sources with its own coordinator approving its own content. Those feeds combine into one wall for your main appeal page while each still stands alone for a branch page or a funder report.
Yes, and the setup most faith groups want is the cautious one: a feed of your own accounts with the review queue switched on, so nothing reaches the website or the hall screen unseen. Rights requests cover anything a member posted that you would like to feature. Nothing here assumes a charity number or a particular legal form.
Yes, with the caveat that matters for a public tag: everything it brings in lands in the review queue rather than on your site. Hashtag collection runs through Instagram and Facebook, and on X with any paid plan. The Instagram route needs an Instagram Business account linked to a Facebook Page. Running a campaign tag does not mean handing your donate page to whoever uses it.
The same feed can run as a live wall on a screen at the event, and your first event runs free: schedule a one-time 24-hour go-live window and run the gala on it before committing to anything. Supporters post to it from their phones with no app and no account, and everything waits for approval before it reaches the screen. After that first event, live walls sit on the Business plan.
All 16 themes are on every plan and so is the theme builder, so your own colours and fonts go in directly rather than you picking the nearest preset. The feed loads after your page rather than blocking it, and the images are sized for the slot they land in.
Pro is $29 a month and lifts the view allowance and the source count. Business is $59 and makes page views unmetered, adds image moderation that reads the picture rather than the caption, and opens live event walls. There is no separate nonprofit tier, which also means there is nothing to apply for and no annual re-certification.
Connect the accounts you already post from, pick a layout, and paste one line into your site. The free plan asks for no card and no proof of charity status, so there is nothing to get approved before you find out whether it looks right on your page.
Works on WordPress, Squarespace, Wix, Shopify, Webflow and plain HTML.